Artwork

Innehåll tillhandahållet av Mentallyunscripted. Allt poddinnehåll inklusive avsnitt, grafik och podcastbeskrivningar laddas upp och tillhandahålls direkt av Mentallyunscripted eller deras podcastplattformspartner. Om du tror att någon använder ditt upphovsrättsskyddade verk utan din tillåtelse kan du följa processen som beskrivs här https://sv.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-app
Gå offline med appen Player FM !

Ep41 – So What? The Tyranny of Merit and Everyone Gets a Participation Trophy

1:07:44
 
Dela
 

Manage episode 305738424 series 2854361
Innehåll tillhandahållet av Mentallyunscripted. Allt poddinnehåll inklusive avsnitt, grafik och podcastbeskrivningar laddas upp och tillhandahålls direkt av Mentallyunscripted eller deras podcastplattformspartner. Om du tror att någon använder ditt upphovsrättsskyddade verk utan din tillåtelse kan du följa processen som beskrivs här https://sv.player.fm/legal.

Is a system based on individual ability or achievement ruining society by creating a feeling of hubris in society's winners and resentment in its losers? In Mentally Unscripted episode 41, Paul and Scott review The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good? by Michael J. Sandel. In that book, the author claims that a merit-based system is destroying the common good.

Resources

* The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good?

* Meritocracy: A system in which advancement is based on individual ability or achievement.

* Does America Hate the "Poorly Educated"? by Matt Taibi

Mental Models

* Confirmation bias

* Disconfirming evidence

* Error of induction

* Inversion

* False dichotomy

Top Takeaways

* According to the author, western society is struggling because our culture of meritocracy is destroying the common good. Those who succeed have a sense of hubris and look down on those who are less successful, and the less successful resent those who succeed. Resentment against the elites is causing a rise in populism.

* On the other hand, aristocracies are less prone to hubris and resentment because people understand that their success is attributable to luck.

* The common good requires society to balance justice, goodness, and progress.

* The author's argument is weak because he doesn't take disconfirming evidence into account in his analysis, and he focuses almost exclusively on language from politicians to prove his point.

Engage with Scott and Paul on the Twitter thought control machine.

We’re also on Odysee (full episodes and clips).

Follow Scott at Strength and Reason.


This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mentallyunscripted.com
  continue reading

59 episoder

Artwork
iconDela
 
Manage episode 305738424 series 2854361
Innehåll tillhandahållet av Mentallyunscripted. Allt poddinnehåll inklusive avsnitt, grafik och podcastbeskrivningar laddas upp och tillhandahålls direkt av Mentallyunscripted eller deras podcastplattformspartner. Om du tror att någon använder ditt upphovsrättsskyddade verk utan din tillåtelse kan du följa processen som beskrivs här https://sv.player.fm/legal.

Is a system based on individual ability or achievement ruining society by creating a feeling of hubris in society's winners and resentment in its losers? In Mentally Unscripted episode 41, Paul and Scott review The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good? by Michael J. Sandel. In that book, the author claims that a merit-based system is destroying the common good.

Resources

* The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good?

* Meritocracy: A system in which advancement is based on individual ability or achievement.

* Does America Hate the "Poorly Educated"? by Matt Taibi

Mental Models

* Confirmation bias

* Disconfirming evidence

* Error of induction

* Inversion

* False dichotomy

Top Takeaways

* According to the author, western society is struggling because our culture of meritocracy is destroying the common good. Those who succeed have a sense of hubris and look down on those who are less successful, and the less successful resent those who succeed. Resentment against the elites is causing a rise in populism.

* On the other hand, aristocracies are less prone to hubris and resentment because people understand that their success is attributable to luck.

* The common good requires society to balance justice, goodness, and progress.

* The author's argument is weak because he doesn't take disconfirming evidence into account in his analysis, and he focuses almost exclusively on language from politicians to prove his point.

Engage with Scott and Paul on the Twitter thought control machine.

We’re also on Odysee (full episodes and clips).

Follow Scott at Strength and Reason.


This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mentallyunscripted.com
  continue reading

59 episoder

Alla avsnitt

×
 
Loading …

Välkommen till Player FM

Player FM scannar webben för högkvalitativa podcasts för dig att njuta av nu direkt. Den är den bästa podcast-appen och den fungerar med Android, Iphone och webben. Bli medlem för att synka prenumerationer mellan enheter.

 

Snabbguide