Why The Term 'Least Restrictive' Has Nothing To Do With Physical Or Mechanical Restraint Mark Dawes' Podcasts podcast

Artwork

Mark Dawes Podcasting Education

Innehåll tillhandahållet av Mark Dawes. Allt poddinnehåll inklusive avsnitt, grafik och podcastbeskrivningar laddas upp och tillhandahålls direkt av Mark Dawes eller deras podcastplattformspartner. Om du tror att någon använder ditt upphovsrättsskyddade verk utan din tillåtelse kan du följa processen som beskrivs här https://sv.player.fm/legal.

Mark Dawes' Podcasts « »
Why The Term 'Least Restrictive' Has Nothing To Do With Physical or Mechanical Restraint

2+ y ago 7:52

Dela

MP3•Episod hem

Innehåll tillhandahållet av Mark Dawes. Allt poddinnehåll inklusive avsnitt, grafik och podcastbeskrivningar laddas upp och tillhandahålls direkt av Mark Dawes eller deras podcastplattformspartner. Om du tror att någon använder ditt upphovsrättsskyddade verk utan din tillåtelse kan du följa processen som beskrivs här https://sv.player.fm/legal.

Why The Term 'Least Restrictive' Has Nothing To Do With Physical or Mechanical Restraint.

Every now and then I hear someone stating things like "Staff must use the least restrictive method when restraining a patient" etc.

Or "any physical intervention must be the least restrictive option", or words to that effect.

However, those statements are wrong.

They are wrong because they are being used in the wrong context.

I do understand the principle, ethics and morality argument.

No one wants staff rushing in and immediately resorting to high level techniques where they are not required. But that isn't the point I'm raising here.

The point is the term "least restrictive" has nothing to do with a physical or mechanical use of force option.

Let me explain.

To read the full blog post click here - https://nfps.info/why-the-term-least-restrictive-has-nothing-to-do-with-physical-or-mechanical-restraint/

… continue reading

182 episoder

#Mark Dawes #Podcasting Education

Artwork

Why The Term 'Least Restrictive' Has Nothing To Do With Physical or Mechanical Restraint

Mark Dawes' Podcasts

published 2+ y ago

Dela

MP3•Episod hem

Innehåll tillhandahållet av Mark Dawes. Allt poddinnehåll inklusive avsnitt, grafik och podcastbeskrivningar laddas upp och tillhandahålls direkt av Mark Dawes eller deras podcastplattformspartner. Om du tror att någon använder ditt upphovsrättsskyddade verk utan din tillåtelse kan du följa processen som beskrivs här https://sv.player.fm/legal.

Why The Term 'Least Restrictive' Has Nothing To Do With Physical or Mechanical Restraint.

Every now and then I hear someone stating things like "Staff must use the least restrictive method when restraining a patient" etc.

Or "any physical intervention must be the least restrictive option", or words to that effect.

However, those statements are wrong.

They are wrong because they are being used in the wrong context.

I do understand the principle, ethics and morality argument.

No one wants staff rushing in and immediately resorting to high level techniques where they are not required. But that isn't the point I'm raising here.

The point is the term "least restrictive" has nothing to do with a physical or mechanical use of force option.

Let me explain.

To read the full blog post click here - https://nfps.info/why-the-term-least-restrictive-has-nothing-to-do-with-physical-or-mechanical-restraint/

… continue reading

182 episoder

#Mark Dawes #Podcasting Education

Все серии

×

Välkommen till Player FM

Player FM scannar webben för högkvalitativa podcasts för dig att njuta av nu direkt. Den är den bästa podcast-appen och den fungerar med Android, Iphone och webben. Bli medlem för att synka prenumerationer mellan enheter.

Lyssna på 500+ ämnen