Artwork

Innehåll tillhandahållet av Catherine Carr and David Runciman. Allt poddinnehåll inklusive avsnitt, grafik och podcastbeskrivningar laddas upp och tillhandahålls direkt av Catherine Carr and David Runciman eller deras podcastplattformspartner. Om du tror att någon använder ditt upphovsrättsskyddade verk utan din tillåtelse kan du följa processen som beskrivs här https://sv.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-app
Gå offline med appen Player FM !

Niall Ferguson on Catastrophe

36:14
 
Dela
 

Manage episode 292931016 series 1163747
Innehåll tillhandahållet av Catherine Carr and David Runciman. Allt poddinnehåll inklusive avsnitt, grafik och podcastbeskrivningar laddas upp och tillhandahålls direkt av Catherine Carr and David Runciman eller deras podcastplattformspartner. Om du tror att någon använder ditt upphovsrättsskyddade verk utan din tillåtelse kan du följa processen som beskrivs här https://sv.player.fm/legal.

We talk to the historian Niall Ferguson about the politics of catastrophe, from pandemics and famines to world wars and climate change. Have we been worrying about the right things? Why have some countries done so much better than others with Covid? And what can history teach us about the worst that can happen? Plus, how likely is it that a cold war between the US and China turns hot?


Talking Points:


Niall argues that COVID is more like the Asian flu in ‘57/’58 than the 1918/1919 Spanish flu.

  • However the economic response is unprecedented; the Internet made lockdowns at this scale and duration possible.
  • Lockdowns were a near panic response that were necessitated by initial political failures in the West.

When we’re trying to assess the political impact of a disaster, the body count is not the most important thing.

  • A disaster can kill a lot of people and be virtually forgotten if it doesn’t have cascading consequences.
  • We will probably remember the experience of lockdown more than the mortality rates.

What did we get wrong about the COVID response?

  • Controlling travel early on made a difference, and most Western states did not do that.
  • The network structure of a polity is the most important thing in a pandemic, especially in an era of globalized travel.

The distinction between natural and manmade disasters is a false one.

  • The scale of impact is a function of how we, collectively and our leaders, individually make decisions.
  • Humans do not seem to be very good at thinking pragmatically about risks; we tend to ignore them in practice while simultaneously constructing apocalyptic fantasies.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Further Learning:

And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking

  continue reading

379 episoder

Artwork

Niall Ferguson on Catastrophe

TALKING POLITICS

143 subscribers

published

iconDela
 
Manage episode 292931016 series 1163747
Innehåll tillhandahållet av Catherine Carr and David Runciman. Allt poddinnehåll inklusive avsnitt, grafik och podcastbeskrivningar laddas upp och tillhandahålls direkt av Catherine Carr and David Runciman eller deras podcastplattformspartner. Om du tror att någon använder ditt upphovsrättsskyddade verk utan din tillåtelse kan du följa processen som beskrivs här https://sv.player.fm/legal.

We talk to the historian Niall Ferguson about the politics of catastrophe, from pandemics and famines to world wars and climate change. Have we been worrying about the right things? Why have some countries done so much better than others with Covid? And what can history teach us about the worst that can happen? Plus, how likely is it that a cold war between the US and China turns hot?


Talking Points:


Niall argues that COVID is more like the Asian flu in ‘57/’58 than the 1918/1919 Spanish flu.

  • However the economic response is unprecedented; the Internet made lockdowns at this scale and duration possible.
  • Lockdowns were a near panic response that were necessitated by initial political failures in the West.

When we’re trying to assess the political impact of a disaster, the body count is not the most important thing.

  • A disaster can kill a lot of people and be virtually forgotten if it doesn’t have cascading consequences.
  • We will probably remember the experience of lockdown more than the mortality rates.

What did we get wrong about the COVID response?

  • Controlling travel early on made a difference, and most Western states did not do that.
  • The network structure of a polity is the most important thing in a pandemic, especially in an era of globalized travel.

The distinction between natural and manmade disasters is a false one.

  • The scale of impact is a function of how we, collectively and our leaders, individually make decisions.
  • Humans do not seem to be very good at thinking pragmatically about risks; we tend to ignore them in practice while simultaneously constructing apocalyptic fantasies.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Further Learning:

And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking

  continue reading

379 episoder

Alla avsnitt

×
 
Loading …

Välkommen till Player FM

Player FM scannar webben för högkvalitativa podcasts för dig att njuta av nu direkt. Den är den bästa podcast-appen och den fungerar med Android, Iphone och webben. Bli medlem för att synka prenumerationer mellan enheter.

 

Snabbguide