))
A public good: every Supreme Court Oral Argument since 2010. Making the Highest Court more accessible for a modern audience. The DC Bar blog's piece about this podcast can be found here: https://www.tinyurl.com/scotuspod. If you'd like to support the law student who created this project instead of studying you can do so here: https://www.tinyurl.com/scotusguy. Thanks for listening! Patreon
…
continue reading
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to April/May. You can listen to the sidebar version of each Supreme Court Case https://thesidebar.transistor.fm/
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
In under 30 minutes. Do you want to understand specific cases? We are here to provide commentary on every Supreme Court case.
…
continue reading
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
…
continue reading
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court decision syllabus, read without personal commentary. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly. Founded by RJ Dieken. Now hosted by Jake Leahy. Frequent guest host Jeff Barnum. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
…
continue reading
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada’s highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court’s website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
Any listeners out there...really want entertaining basketball content? Don't want to worry about the hosts - all on the show trying to force "controversial" hot takes, all in your earbuds, yelling back and forth to win an argument? Come to The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Check back with the SC trio; Robaire, Chris, and Henri, Wednesdays as we discuss the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading
Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services | 01/14/25 | Docket #: 23-971
…
continue reading
1
Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida, No. 23-997 [Arg: 1.13.2025]
18:38
18:38
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
18:38
The Supreme Court case, Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida. The central question is whether a former employee, who alleges disability discrimination regarding post-employment benefits, can sue under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) even if the alleged discrimination occurred before the employee's retirement. The arguments presented by bot…
…
continue reading
This week's episode, which covers the oral argument in Tiktok v. Garland, is just Brett and no Nazim. We ask that you see past this fatal flaw and still enjoy discussion on why TikTok may not be a First Amendment case, what kind of First Amendment case it could be, and whether it would fail a strict scrutiny analysis. Law starts from the beginning.…
…
continue reading
1
TikTok's future in hands of Supreme Court as justices hear arguments against ban
7:01
7:01
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
7:01
In a matter of days, one of the most popular social media apps in the country could pull the plug if the Supreme Court doesn't grant it a legal reprieve. Concerns about TikTok's Chinese ownership led Congress to pass a law that would ban it in the United States unless its parent company sells it. John Yang discussed more with PBS News Supreme Court…
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, as applied to TikTok, violates the First Amendment.
…
continue reading
1
J.W. v. His Majesty the King (40956)
2:33:34
2:33:34
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
2:33:34
(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE) The appellant, an Indigenous man with significant cognitive difficulties, repeatedly sexually assaulted a worker at the group home where he resided. He remained in custody pending trial, including a period of detention in a psychiatric facility while temporarily unfit to stand trial. After resiling from three agreements to…
…
continue reading
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas (Decided December 10, 2024) In Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, the Supreme Court addressed whether federal courts have jurisdiction to review the revocation of a previously approved visa petition under the Immigration and Nationality Act. The case involved Amina Bouarfa, a U.S. citizen, whose petition for her noncitizen spouse was revoked …
…
continue reading
Thompson v. United States | 01/14/25 | Docket #: 23-1095
…
continue reading
1
Hewitt v. U.S., No. 23-1002 [Arg: 1.13.2025]
16:11
16:11
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
16:11
The Supreme Court case, Hewitt v. United States. The case centers on whether the Act applies to resentencings following vacated sentences, a point of contention regarding the interpretation of the phrase "a sentence for the offense has not been imposed." The justices debated the statutory language's ambiguity, considering the present-perfect tense …
…
continue reading
1
Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida, No. 23-997 [Arg: 1.13.2025]
1:18:04
1:18:04
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
1:18:04
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, under the Americans with Disabilities Act, a former employee — who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed — loses her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Hewitt v. U.S., No. 23-1002 [Arg: 1.13.2025]
1:30:43
1:30:43
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
1:30:43
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Step Act’s sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant originally sentenced before the act’s enactment, when that original sentence is judicially vacated and the defendant is resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the act’s enactment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
Thompson v. United StatesAv Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services
42:05
42:05
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
42:05
Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy ServicesAv Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Stanley v. City of Sanford | 01/13/25 | Docket #: 23-997
…
continue reading
Hewitt v. United States | 01/13/25 | Docket #: 23-1002
…
continue reading
Stanley v. City of SanfordAv Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Hewitt v. United StatesAv Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
TikTok v. Garland, No. 24-656 [Arg: 1.10.2025]
11:17
11:17
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
11:17
The Supreme Court case, TikTok, Inc., et al. v. Merrick B. Garland, and a consolidated case. The arguments center on the constitutionality of a law mandating TikTok's divestiture from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, due to national security concerns. The petitioners argue the law violates TikTok's First Amendment rights, while the respondent…
…
continue reading
1
TikTok v. Garland, No. 24-656 [Arg: 1.10.2025]
2:28:50
2:28:50
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
2:28:50
QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Av Better Informed Network
…
continue reading
TikTok, Inc. v. Garland, Att'y Gen. | 01/10/25 | Docket #: 24-656
…
continue reading
1
TikTok, Inc. v. Garland, Att'y Gen.
2:07:48
2:07:48
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
2:07:48
TikTok, Inc. v. Garland, Att'y Gen.Av Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Tammy Marion Bouvette v. His Majesty the King (40780)
2:33:34
2:33:34
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
2:33:34
(SEALING ORDER) (CERTAIN INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC) The appellant, Tammy Marion Bouvette, was babysitting a 19-month old baby who died while having a bath. An autopsy was conducted by Dr. Evan Matshes. The appellant was charged with second degree murder. The appellant pleaded guilty to criminal negligence causing death. The British Co…
…
continue reading
1
Opsis Airport Services Inc. v. Attorney General of Québec, et al. (40786)
2:39:12
2:39:12
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
2:39:12
The appellant, Opsis Airport Services Inc., is a federal company that operates the emergency call dispatch centre at Pierre Elliot Trudeau International Airport. The respondent the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions charged Opsis with operating an enterprise that carried on private security activities without holding an agency licence of t…
…
continue reading
1
Dustin Kinamore v. His Majesty the King (40964)
2:42:11
2:42:11
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
2:42:11
(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE) Mr. Kinamore, when he was 22-years old, and the complainant, when she was 16-years old, met at a motorcycle shop and they exchanged messages for a few months. They met for dinner and a movie at Mr. Kinmore’s apartment. Afterwards, Mr. Kinamore was charged with sexual assault. Both the complainant and Mr. Kinamore testified…
…
continue reading
1
Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, No. 23-900 [Arg: 12.11.2024]
12:33
12:33
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
12:33
The Supreme Court case, Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers. The core dispute centers on the calculation of disgorgement of profits under the Lanham Act, specifically whether a defendant's profits can include those of legally distinct affiliates. The petitioner argues that corporate separateness should be respected and that the lower courts erred …
…
continue reading
1
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, No. 23-975 [Arg: 12.10.2024]
11:18
11:18
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
11:18
The Supreme Court case, Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, et al., v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al. The central issue concerns the scope of environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for infrastructure projects. The justices debate the appropriate standard for determining which environmental impacts an agency must …
…
continue reading
1
Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, No. 23-861 [Arg: 12.9.2024]
9:53
9:53
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
9:53
The Supreme Court case, Feliciano v. Department of Transportation. This concerns the interpretation of a statute determining differential pay for reservists called to active duty during a national emergency. The petitioner argues that "during" implies a purely temporal connection, while the respondent contends it requires a substantive connection t…
…
continue reading
1
Kousisis v. U.S., No. 23-909 [Arg: 12.9.2024]
1:26:52
1:26:52
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
1:26:52
The Supreme Court case, Kousisis v. U.S. The central issue is the interpretation of federal fraud statutes, specifically whether a property interest must be harmed to constitute property fraud. Petitioners argue that only cases involving actual economic loss qualify, while the government contends that any material misrepresentation resulting in the…
…
continue reading
1
Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, No. 23-900 [Arg: 12.11.2024]
1:10:58
1:10:58
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
1:10:58
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Av Better Informed Network
…
continue reading
1
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, No. 23-975 [Arg: 12.10.2024]
1:50:37
1:50:37
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
1:50:37
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Av Better Informed Network
…
continue reading
1
Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, No. 23-861 [Arg: 12.9.2024]
1:13:34
1:13:34
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
1:13:34
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is not directly connected to the national emergency. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Av Better Informed Network
…
continue reading
1
Kousisis v. U.S., No. 23-909 [Arg: 12.9.2024]
1:26:52
1:26:52
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
1:26:52
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether deception to induce a commercial exchange can constitute mail or wire fraud, even if inflicting economic harm on the alleged victim was not the object of the scheme; whether a sovereign’s statutory, regulatory, or policy interest is a property interest when compliance is a material term of payment for goods or services; …
…
continue reading
Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. | 12/11/24 | Docket #: 23-900
…
continue reading
1
Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc.
1:10:57
1:10:57
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
1:10:57
A case in which the Court will decide whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates.
…
continue reading
1
Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc.
1:00:56
1:00:56
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
1:00:56
Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc.Av Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Seven County Coalition v. Eagle County | 12/10/24 | Docket #: 23-975
…
continue reading
1
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado
1:50:36
1:50:36
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
1:50:36
A case in which the Court will decide whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority.
…
continue reading
1
Seven County Coalition v. Eagle County
1:34:59
1:34:59
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
1:34:59
Seven County Coalition v. Eagle CountyAv Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Michael Paul Dunmore v. Raha Mehralian (41108)
2:17:00
2:17:00
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
2:17:00
The parties were married in June 2015. They lived in Japan until 2016 when they moved to the United Arab Emirates. They separated for a period in 2017, but reconciled in 2018 and then lived together in Oman until March 2020 when they travelled to Ontario for a number of reasons, including to visit Mr. Dunmore’s parents. They had planned to return t…
…
continue reading
Feliciano v. Dept. of Transportation | 12/09/24 | Docket #: 23-861
…
continue reading
Kousisis v. United States | 12/09/24 | Docket #: 23-909
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will consider the scope of property interests and fraud in government contracting, particularly when deception occurs without clear economic harm.
…
continue reading
1
Feliciano v. Department of Transportation
1:13:33
1:13:33
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
1:13:33
A case in which the Court will decide whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is not directly connected to the national emergency.
…
continue reading
1
Feliciano v. Dept. of Transportation
1:03:10
1:03:10
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
1:03:10
Feliciano v. Dept. of TransportationAv Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Kousisis v. United StatesAv Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
U.S. v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477 [Arg: 12.4.2024]
16:06
16:06
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
16:06
This episode discusses the Supreme Court oral argument in the case United States v. Skrmetti. The case centers on the constitutionality of a Tennessee law (SB1) restricting access to gender-affirming care for minors. The petitioner argues SB1 constitutes unlawful sex discrimination, requiring heightened judicial scrutiny under the Equal Protection …
…
continue reading
1
U.S. v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477 [Arg: 12.4.2024]
2:21:11
2:21:11
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
2:21:11
QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether Tennessee Senate Bill 1, which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or to treat “purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity,” violates the equal protection …
…
continue reading
1
Pascal Varennes v. His Majesty the King (40662)
2:25:35
2:25:35
Spela senare
Spela senare
Listor
Gilla
Gillad
2:25:35
In 2015, the appellant was charged with the second degree murder of his spouse. Before his trial, a Quebec Superior Court judge allowed his motion for the trial to take place before a judge alone, in accordance with s. 473(1) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, despite the absence of consent from the respondent prosecutor. The judge was of …
…
continue reading
